No Justification for Smith’s Incidentally True Beliefs

Abstract Edmund Gettier (1963) argued that there can be justified true belief ( JTB ) is not knowledge. The correctness of Gettier’s argument questioned by showing S mith his famous examples does earn justification for incidentally beliefs, while a doxastically more conscientious person would come to hold but false beliefs. So, (and analogous) cases do result in and belief. This due tension between deductive closure evidential support. For being justified, any believing, disbelieving, or withholding deductively inferred propositions must distributed proportionally given proportionality principle has primacy over case conflict. Although the author’s save -account, it explains why subjects situations